Pricing Table Particle

Quickly drive clicks-and-mortar catalysts for change
  • Basic
  • Standard Compliant Channels
  • $50
  • Completely synergize resource taxing relationships via premier market
  • 1 GB of space
  • Support at $25/hour
  • Sign Up
  • Premium
  • Standard Compliant Channels
  • $100
  • Completely synergize resource taxing relationships via premier market
  • 10 GB of space
  • Support at $15/hour
  • Sign Up
  • Platinum
  • Standard Compliant Channels
  • $250
  • Completely synergize resource taxing relationships via premier market
  • 30 GB of space
  • Support at $5/hour
  • Sign Up

Login Module

Breaking Stories

Brown Bag Lunchtime Seminar on "Decarbonising Fiji Shipping, a once-in-a-generation opportunity"?

Catch up with Dr. Peter Nuttall, Scientific and Technical Advisor to the Micronesia Center for Sustainable Transport, shared invaluable insights that can revolutionise Fiji's maritime sector.

But the conversation doesn't end there! Let's take action together.

Stay tuned for upcoming events and join us as we pave the way for a greener, more sustainable future for the shipping industry.

#SustainableFuture #TakeAction #fijishipping

[17 April 2024] - The maritime industry faces unprecedented challenges as it navigates towards a sustainable and decarbonized future. In a recent webinar titled “DissectingMEPC81 - is IMO on course for an equitable transition?," we asked leading experts whether the IMO is on course towards sustainable maritime sector through an equitable transition.

The Micronesian Center for Sustainable Transport (MCST) hosted the webinar to raise awareness and spark conversations around the International Maritime Organization (IMO) negotiating process informing the adoption of binding technological and economic measures, which are due by April 2025 at MEPC83. This, to ensure the sector delivers on the net-zero by 2050 target set out in the 2023 IMO GHG Strategy.

The webinar featured global experts. Dr. Aly Shaw, a Senior Policy Expert who brought her insights into regulatory frameworks, Ms. Jessica Taylor, a seasoned maritime professional from Barbados, and Mr. John Kautoke, an Advisor on Maritime GHG matters for Tonga, who provided valuable input based on his extensive experience in IMO negotiations. Mr John Taukäve from the island of Rotuma moderated the webinar.

Ambassador Albon Ishoda invited these panelists and more than seventy participants to discuss whether or not IMO is on course for an equitable transition. The IMO is the United Nations agency where eight Pacific countries, recently joined by Caribbean Small Islands Developing States (SIDS), have been pushing for a 1.5-aligned regulatory framework for international shipping. They have proposed a universal levy on GHG emissions starting at $150 per tonne of Co2-equivalent to give a clear price signal to the industry - and a revenue disbursement mechanism that enables necessary investments are made, ensuring an equitable transition Ambassador Ishoda, who serves as the Marshallese Special Envoy for Maritime Energy Transitions, opened discussions with a compelling statement. "Something potentially world-changing did happen at IMO. We aren’t there yet! The case for a universal mandatory levy on GHG at a high enough entry price to start to incentivise the market and resource the equitable transaction we have all committed to remained squarely on the table. Not only does it remain as one of three potential architectures for us to agree at MEPC83, it was the option that gained most traction and did so because a growing chorus of small voices increasingly understand that only the highest ambition pathway gets us anywhere close to 1.5."

Across two sessions, allowing participation across all timezones, panelists and participants stressed the necessity for concrete measures that will deliver an equitable transition through the IMO, while warning of the inequitable implications of regional carbon pricing measures that have emerged due to slow progress at the IMO over the past two decades. The webinar’s open dialogue reflects the commitment of Pacific and Caribbean island states to widely engage with stakeholders ahead of upcoming negotiations at the IMO.

Ambassador Ishoda captured the tone of the webinar by underscoring the potential for transformative change of strong IMO measures. Though with the caveat that significant work remains ahead to ensure no country is left behind in this urgent and important transition.



Webinar recordings

Session 1

Session 2

Republic of the Marshall Islands

Statement to Closing Plenary of MEPC81

Agenda Item 7 – Reduction of GHG emissions from ships

22 March 2024

H. E. Ambassador Albon Ishoda, Presidential Special Envoy for the Maritime Transition

Thank you Chair.

I bring warm greetings of "Iakwe" to you all from the people and Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands.

Assembled delegates, esteemed guests, and distinguished members of the International Maritime Organization, it is both an honor and a privilege to address you today on a matter of utmost importance ensuring a sustainable future for our islands, our oceans, our future generations and our planet!

All protocols observed.

Mr. Chair, for our communities on the frontline, the deepening climate emergency is a very real and very now crisis, one that right now is threatening our very homes and survival. The flights out of Majuro today are full of families fleeing their ancestral homes. Before I proceed with my brief statement, I wish to share a bit of history with you all today. Back home within our communities, there are groups of families and friends that have already experienced the impacts of forced migration first hand. I am talking about 78 years ago.

Mr. Chair, from 1946-1958, the United States government conducted their nuclear testing program over our northern atolls of Enewetak and Bikini. A total of 67 atomic and hydrogen bombs over a span of 12 years. Among the 67 nuclear weapons, the renowned "Bravo", which was the codename of the bomb, was the biggest and most powerful atmospheric nuclear weapon ever detonated by the US government. It was 1,000 times more powerful than the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan.

Mr. Chair, of course prior to the testing, people had to be removed (not temporarily but permanently) from their lands, where culture and traditional heritage have been cherished and inherited from generation to generation for some 4000 years. Today, I am disheartened to say that these involuntary migrants continue to be faced with hardships and still experience the affliction of being refugees outcast within different communities in-their own country. 78 years later, they have not returned to their homelands due to the high level of radioactivity measures that are still present within these islands.

Mr. Chairman, I share this short history because as a nation, highly vulnerable to climate change and sea level rise, we definitely do not want to go through another wave of forced migration. We have lived through it for the last 78 years and still breathe through its calamities. Now we are being forced to re-live it.

Today, we stand at a critical juncture in human history, where the decisions we have made this week will reverberate for generations to come. The urgency of addressing climate change and its impacts on our environment demands bold and decisive action. The 1.5-degree Celsius target outlined in the Paris Agreement serves as our guiding light, our beacon of hope in a world fraught with uncertainty.

At the heart of our endeavor lies the imperative to align shipping’s agenda with the 1.5-degree target. This necessitates a fundamental shift in the way we approach maritime governance and regulation. We must recognize that the shipping industry, while indispensable to global trade and commerce, also carries a significant environmental burden. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to embrace the principle of "polluter pays" and implement economic measures that incentivize sustainability, penalize environmental degradation, and drive shipping’s green transition. To achieve the transition we must go through requires a paradigm shift of unprecedented scale and scale. Weak or cheap half measures are not available to us if we are to align with 1.5.

However, the question inevitably arises: what do we do with the revenue generated as a byproduct of such measures? This is where our commitment to the principles of equitable transition comes into play. We must ensure that the burden of transition does not disproportionately fall upon the most vulnerable communities and economies. Rather, we must strive for fairness and justice in the distribution of resources and benefits.

Furthermore, we must recognize that the transition to a sustainable shipping industry is not solely an environmental imperative but also an economic and social one. It presents us with an opportunity to create new green jobs, foster innovation, and promote social cohesion. Therefore, as we chart our course forward, let us not lose sight of the broader vision of a just, equitable and sustainable future for all in line with the Sustainable Development Goals.

Equitable transition must not only guide our substantive outcomes but also the process we employ to reach them. It requires inclusivity, transparency, and meaningful engagement with all stakeholders, including civil society organizations, indigenous communities, and marginalized groups. Their voices must be heard, their concerns addressed, and their rights respected. Last week we heard a significant and growing convergence of the voices of our smaller states on this matter.

We must also get the technical aspects of this transition right. That means a simple GFS that follows a GHG price, but is enacted at the same point, to provide long term certainty for the industry. It means dealing with emissions on a well to wake basis, for both the technical and economic element. And it means the most rigorous standards of environmental integrity for all aspects of the Lifecycle Assessment Guidelines.

Therefore, let us reaffirm our commitment to the 1.5-degree target, to the principle of polluter pays, and to the principles of equitable transition. Let us seize this moment as an opportunity to shape a better world for ourselves and for future generations. Together, we can chart a course towards a more sustainable, inclusive, and resilient shipping industry, in which safe and just zero emission shipping connects all regions of the world, and advances the prosperity of every country.

We have made good progress these last two weeks, but much work remains. We look forward to engaging with all interested parties intersessionally to place us in the best possible position when we return in September.

Thank you.


Pacific delegations and technical advisors at IMO Headquarters in London

[London, England, March 16, 2024] – In July 2023, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted a new climate strategy to phase out greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Now member states need to agree on legally binding measures to turn that ambition into a realistic and predictable pathway that can ensure the investment in long-term solutions will happen as soon as possible.

Finding agreement on these measures is what was the key point of discussion Sixteenth Meeting of the Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (ISWG-GHG 16). While there is only one year left before these measures should be adopted, not all states agree on what the best way forward is.

Three possible combinations emerged at ISWG-GHG16. With a clear majority supporting a levy in some form, the next round of negotiations will begin to clarify the details of each approach:

  • Fourteen countries favored a flexible fuel standard with a credit trading mechanism or Emission Trading System (ETS).
  • Eighteen countries advocated for a simplified fuel standard alongside a universal GHG price, such as a levy.
  • Sixteen countries supported a flexible fuel standard with a universal GHG pricing mechanism, including a levy.

All three options include putting a price on shipping emissions. But only the levy of $150 per tonne of GHG emissions will provide a strong economic incentive to speed up the transition, while generating revenue to fund an equitable transition as a by-product.

The pressure on all stakeholders, particularly the growing 6PAC+ coalition of Pacific Island countries, now joined by a growing coalition of Caribbean States, is immense as Dr. Tristan Smith, Director of University Maritime Advisory Services, highlighted the interconnected themes of climate action, energy transition, and equitable development as crucial for the shipping sector's sustainability. He commended the leadership demonstrated by diverse countries in proposing specific solutions.

The pressure on stakeholders, particularly the Pacific-Caribbean 6PAC+ coalition, comprising of Belize, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu, is immense. They advocate for a combination of measures including a GHG Fuel Standard (GFS) and a universal GHG levy, emphasizing equitable revenue distribution and prioritizing the needs of developing countries and Small Island Developing States (SIDS).

Ahead of the ISWG GHG16, the 6PAC+ had submitted a formal proposal for a combination of measures comprising a GFS and a universal GHG levy, along with proposals on revenue distribution. The working group saw the significant development in the establishment of greenhouse gas intensity limits within the GFS, which will require increasingly stringent emissions reductions of fuels over time, in order to deliver on GHG reduction targets.

They continue to defend the combination of a GFS and universal GHG levy as the only one of the three proposals on the table that can actually deliver on a truly equitable global transition that leaves no state behind. Several additional countries have come out in support for these proposals during negotiations. The 6PAC+ also emphasized the need to apply the "polluter pays" principle to the IMO’s revenue distribution, directing funds towards both pollution mitigation at source and reparations for environmental impact.

Despite broad agreement on adopting both a GHG Fuel Standard and a carbon pricing mechanism, member states still hold highly divergent views on the detail of the measures and now face an increasing challenge in converting the ambitions of the IMO’s overall climate strategy to legally binding rules for ships and their users within a tight timeframe. Given the considerable sums involved in this ‘trillions transition’ now committed to, the stakes are high for all participants.

Dr Smith advises “It is hard to overstate the significance of what might be agreed in Spring 2025. The specifics of these policy measures will determine the ‘shape’ of international shipping, capital flows in the maritime value chains and have major implications for the economies of many countries and global trade”.

While ISWG-GHG 16 saw increased support for a price on global shipping emissions, this week the focus shifts to the Marine Environment Protect Committee (MEPC81). With only two more Committee meetings available before the IMO must confirm the full design of the measures in 2025, we can expect a long hard week of negotiations.

As the IMO continues navigating this intricate policy landscape, the growing Pacific-Caribbean 6PAC+ coalition remains steadfast in its commitment to steering the maritime industry towards a sustainable and equitable future for all States.